When SSDs first entered the market, it looked like a revolution in Data Recovery Services storage devices. Their read and write speeds seemed so impressive as well as their reliability even when compared to RAID storage systems.
However, most users who encountered an SSD for the first time in their life thought that it was supposed to work for many years as long as the new design had no moving parts. So they thought that SSDs should be less prone to failures and errors. The fewer parts that are likely to fail, the more reliable a device is.
Yet daily practice shows that this logical assumption can sometimes be wrong. As soon as the first SSDs went on sale, users began to test Data Recovery Services them to find out, empirically, the real reliability of the new drives. Even renowned laboratories have followed suit.
Some tests have confirmed that SSDs are as reliable as conventional HDDs, while others have suggested that SSDs and HDDs are only as reliable for the first two years, and then a drive was as reliable as luck would have it. It has become apparent that SSDs are also error prone and can fail completely, in the worst case.
When you become the proud owner of an SSD, you certainly don’t have to worry about failing mechanical parts, simply because there aren’t any. Yet its electronics tend to fail just as often. Capacitors can swell, power supplies can fail due to overload or power surges, and the Twitter disk controller can go wild after a power outage or rapid voltage fluctuations.
There’s a popular belief that SSDs are likely to fail very soon, but that can only happen if the drive itself has been damaged or faulty. Years of research reports indicate that most SSDs tend to wear out linearly and in proportion to their workload. This means that new drives should be more reliable than older models.